![]() ![]() It should have pointed directly to the product page: As a former employee of the company I do not wish to add the row again with that correction, but as a Netizen I want to point out that Wikipedia is about collecting information, not about censorship. One of the deleted rows was ThinLinc, it had a pointer to the manufacturers (Cendio Systems) home page, which of course was not good. Just because a product is little-known, doesn't mean it can't be best-in-class, hypothetically speaking. In any case, I don't think that we should only be comparing remote desktop software products that have individual Wikipedia articles. Stop deleting table rows in a biased manner! An editor just deleted some rows which did not have Wikipedia articles about them, but did not delete all of the table rows satisfying that criterion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |